Pair Search: read the attempt counter halfway through a larger board
Separate matched pairs from completed attempts, calculate a realistic lower bound for the rest of a run and keep locations stable as the board grows taller.
Worked examples use the Standard board unless a different size is stated. Hard and Expert may change the board dimensions or amount of information to track.
Pairs and attempts count different events
A pair is progress toward clearing the board. An attempt is a completed choice of two different face-down cards, whether they match or not. Opening just one card does not add an attempt yet. This distinction becomes useful on Hard’s twelve pairs and Expert’s sixteen, where a long run can make the two counters seem harder to interpret.
Each successful attempt removes exactly one pair from consideration. The theoretical starting floor is therefore twelve attempts on Hard or sixteen on Expert. That floor assumes every completed choice matches. It is a mathematical baseline, not an expected result for an unfamiliar arrangement and not a score awarded for looking at the board quickly.
Calculate what the remaining board can still require
Suppose a Hard run shows four matched pairs after seven attempts. Eight pairs remain. Even if every later attempt succeeds, finding those eight pairs requires at least eight more completed choices. The final attempt count can therefore be no lower than fifteen. The three earlier mismatches cannot be erased by a perfect finish.
This gives a practical check on your expectations. If you finish in seventeen attempts, the last eight pairs took ten attempts, including two mismatches. You can describe that change precisely without inventing an accuracy percentage or treating a remembered pair as unseen. The counter measures the current run; it does not compare your performance with other players.
Keep the map stable while the page grows
All difficulties use four columns. Standard occupies four rows, Hard six and Expert eight. Refer to a location by its board row and column rather than its distance from the screen’s top edge. On a small viewport, scrolling moves a card on screen without changing its place in the puzzle.
For example, Expert’s bottom-right card is row 8 column 4, while Hard has no eighth row at all. A note such as the heart near the bottom becomes ambiguous after changing difficulty. A position such as row 6 column 4 remains explicit within the current board. Symbols also have readable names, which helps distinguish a ring from the filled circle without depending solely on their appearance.
Use a second pass honestly
Restart returns the same arrangement and clears its attempts. It does not make your knowledge of that arrangement disappear. A lower counter on the restarted board may show that you retained useful locations; it does not demonstrate the same result on a fresh board. New puzzle changes the arrangement, and changing difficulty also starts another layout.
There is no in-game notebook or saved record of previous runs. If you choose to write observations on paper, distinguish current board locations from old ones. Reloading starts another session; do not rely on returning later to preserve a board. The useful habit is to review the information available for the next choice, rather than attributing every improved counter to a general change in memory.
Pause before completing the next choice
There is no time penalty for leaving the first card open while recalling its partner. If an unmatched comparison is closing, wait until those two cards turn back over before selecting another card. A rejected third-card click does not form a new attempt. Let the board’s actual state, not a rush to increase the counter, determine when your next decision begins.
An original guide for this site's implementation. Found an unclear step? Let us know.